Mimi Zeiger

Critic, editor, curator and instigator.

The day before the 2012 Venice Architecture Biennale opened to the public, Wolf D. Prix, COOP HIMMELB(L)AU’s resident avant-gardist issued a statement to the press. Rebuking the curators for banality in the face of crisis, Prix’s missive evokes a colourful vision of architects packed into a sinking gondola, a metaphor for the discipline’s “powerlessness and irrelevance.” And his prickling has a target. “Politicians and project managers, investors and bureaucrats have been deciding on our built environment for a long time now,” he writes. “Not the architects.” Meanwhile, deep in the Biennale, Public Works: Architecture by Civil Servants, OMA’s contribution to Common Ground, counters the Austrian’s lament.

Public Works celebrates the bureaucrat. Read More …

In late January 2011, as Egyptian protesters filled Tahrir Square in Cairo, the activist website IndyMedia.com published exemplary pages from How to Protest Intelligently. Available as a PDF ready to print, the 26-page illustrated pamphlet, published in Arabic and English, clearly spelled out the Egyptian people’s demands and the actions and supplies needed to resist state forces. Read More …

If there’s a common question to be answered by the dozens of projects collected in Spontaneous Interventions, it might be: “What is the role of a local project in a global age?” The individual projects represented—pop-up parks, community agriculture, ad-hoc street furniture, guerrilla bike lanes—are not necessarily overt as they position themselves against the effects of global capital. However, taken as a group, these interventions run counter to the unchecked boom-and-bust development of what David Harvey and others critically describe as the neoliberal city. Small-scale and socially engaged, spontaneous interventions use design to enrich public space and foster civic life at a time when the disparity between daily life and the governmental and corporate mechanisms shaping cities is at an all-time high. Read More …

I heard Anthony Vidler lecture twice this past spring — once in Boston and once in Los Angeles. The subject matter varied as a much as the venue: the East Coast lecture a trip through Vidler’s own intellectual history and at SCI-Arc a jaunty tribute to Big Jim, made tart with a couple well-placed jabs at Shumacheresque parametricism. Yet, in both of Vidler’s lectures the same slide appeared, Richard Hamilton’s collage Just What Is It That Makes Today’s Homes So Different, So Appealing? that appeared as the poster for the Independent Group’s This is Tomorrow exhibition in 1956.

Vidler outted the collage fragment depicting Earth that looms above at the top of the composition, noting that it was torn from a 1955 issue of Life. As this view of the world entered into mainstream public consciousness via the most popular magazine on the planet it carried with it the tension between rampant consumerism and the Cold War. Entitled a 100 Mile Portrait of Earth, the composite photograph was made from stills taken by an aerial movie camera attached to a rocket. At the time, no other color photo had ever been taken from such a high vantage point.

This popularization and implied democratization of a once-privileged view mixes with a Cold War chill in the exhibition Ends of the Earth: Land Art to 1974 at MOCA’s The Geffen Contemporary in Los Angeles. This broad, historical retrospective brings together a generation of artists working under threat of nuclear annihilation, the space race, who possessed an expansionist drive to push outside of the gallery and into the unknowns of landscape. Read More …

In 1909, the french banker Albert Kahn began his Archives of the Planet, a project as ambitious as its title suggests. During the next 22 years—and spanning a world war—Kahn sent a fleet of photographers to more than 50 countries around the globe to create a visual record. Today, the archive is housed at the Musée Albert-Kahn, located in the financier’s former garden estate in suburban Boulogne-Billancourt, just west of Paris. His collection of 72,000 perfectly preserved color autochromes documents a world on the verge of the modern era. Snippets of history we’ve grown accustomed to seeing in sepia tones are pictured in vivid color. These are snapshots of another time, but bright hues in most images render the subjects—including World War I soldiers and Vietnamese performers—immediate and full of life.

Read More …

In Los Angeles: the Architecture of Four Ecologies, Reyner Banham describes Freewayland: the swaths of flat acreage by the I-10 and former ranchos heading out towards Irvine and Pomona. He drolly titled the chapter on these suburban territories “The Plains of Id.” But really, architecture is a landscape of ego. In LA, the icons of modern architecture take to the hills. Houses and apartment buildings climbing up foothills and canyons, climbing higher as economy permits and striving for ridge tops, Freewayland famously appears as backdrop in photographs of these home — a twinkling grid of lights in the distance.

Sitting in that distant grid, on a street south of the Miracle Mile where an early developer skimped on trees, are the Mackey Apartments, designed in 1939 by Rudolph Schindler. Pearl Mackey’s commission was limited: three units and a two-level penthouse for herself. The white stucco box, broken up by the architect’s signature slippage of volumes, is one of Schindler’s few forays into Freewayland. With two exceptions — the Buck House and the iconic Chase House, located on Kings Road in fairly-flat West Hollywood — his residences tend to perch atop or cascade down hillsides. Read More …

Earlier this year, the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) installed Metropolis II (2010), Chris Burden’s large kinetic sculpture—it’s a Gordian knot composed of a plastic roadways, toy train tracks, Erector sets, Legos, and blocks. More than a thousand miniature toy cars zip through this model city at 240-scale miles per hour. Three conveyor belts motor the cars into position and then let them fly. As wheels hit the road, the gallery fills with a familiar sound: traffic.

Metropolis II is quiet when Burden walks into the gallery before the museum opens to the public, as if the city is asleep before rush hour. Is Metropolis II Los Angeles? Burden’s non-committal—he shrugs as if he’s heard this one before. It’s one city or all cites. “It could be Dubai or India or China,” he explains. “I think ultimately it’s any city.”

The artist, with salt and pepper mop-top and sporting striped oxford, greets the Metropolis II operator, a LACMA conservator in a navy blue pit-stop jumpsuit. Her job is to stand inside the urban contraption and make sure there are no pile-ups or cars careening off the tracks. In 2004, when Burden installed a smaller Metropolis in a Japanese museum, the tricked-out Hot Wheels had a tendency to fall off the track. For Metropolis II, Burden produced his own multi-colored fleet (including black and white cop cars). Each custom outfitted with magnets to hold them to the track and tires detailed with Burden’s named spelled out on the side walls. For this month’s cover Burden played car salesman and lined up the vehicles for a dealership portrait. All the little cars are motionless, caught in an eternal bumper-to-bumper jam.

In Los Angeles, because every day brings near-perfect weather, people talk about traffic: back-ups on the I-110, an accident on the 405. Today, January brings more blue sky. Burden’s route from his home studio—located on an expanse of land in Topanga Canyon northwest of the city—takes an hour on a good day. Today was a good day. He drove his wife’s BMW station wagon. With a late start, he made it 40 minutes. A critique often levied at Metropolis II is that Burden’s vision of the city is too car-dependent, too unrealistically seeped in oil, and generally unsustainable. He counters that in the future all cars will be run by satellites and GPS control. “It would all be timed perfectly and you wouldn’t have to slow down at any lights,” he explains. “There wouldn’t be red lights or green lights. You just move right through… like fish.”

Burden’s lived in the Los Angeles area since he moved to Pomona for college in 1965. He’s been through smog, riots, earthquakes, and fires. Challenging performance art pieces that bordered on the edge of disaster positioned Burden as a figure in the Los Angeles art scene in the early 1970s. He took a .22 rifle bullet in his arm for Shoot (1971) and sat for hours on a ladder above a pool of electrified water, 220 (1971). In 1974, he staged another piece of extreme art in a Venice, CA garage. For Trans-Fixed, Burden had himself crucified to the roof of a VW Beetle, complete with a nail hammered through each palm. The car was then pushed into the street, the engine was revved, and then after a photograph was taken, the car was uneventfully returned to the garage.

In the mid-Seventies, Artforum ran one of the first cover stories on Burden. In the piece critic Robert Horvitz wrote of Trans-Fixed, “Replacing the cross with a Volkswagen effectively transformed a religious cliché into a diabolically droll, nightmarish masque: Jesus, indeed.” Nearly four decades later, the relationship between his physical, edgy artworks and the crowd-pleasing, child-friendly Metropolis II seems tenuous. Yet for the artist, the connection is there.

“That was my first car,” Burden says of his Trans-Fixed co-star.

“I owned a lot of Volkswagens and Beetles. They were really good cars when you were in college because you could buy them for $200 or $300 and then sell them for the same amount. They were freebees. I must have had five or six Beetles before I bought my first truck. I was making big sculptures at the time and I was trying to schlep materials around in my Volkswagen. I remember having two inch pipes sticking out though the window frame and the doors getting kind of screwed up.”

In 1975, he created the B-Car, a streamlined, go-cart–like vehicle equipped with four bicycle wheels and ready to propel its driver 100 miles per hour down the road—almost a human-sized version of the toy cars zipping around Metropolis II. Burden’s obsession with cars, and really all modes of transportation, led him to collect dozens of vehicles on his property in Topanga. He has four bulldozers, a Greyline bus, a forklift, an electric crane, a Lotus, two 4x4s, a Mazda RXA, and three Citroën Deux Chevaux trucks. (The last were for an unrealized French project entitled Mini Video Circus. Burden imagined that the little trucks would be equipped with video decks and monitors and then parked like a mini movie theater in a French village. Villagers would pay a franc to watch footage of earthquakes, fires, and riots, or as Burden puts it “unrelenting disaster in Los Angeles.”)

With the success of Metropolis II, Burden is gearing up for a 2013 exhibition at the New Museum in New York City. He’s scheming: “I want to use the exterior of the museum.

I don’t think I can get away with it but I’m certainly going to push [the exhibition] to the outside.” Burden even has plans to top the museum with the two mini skyscrapers he designed in 2003.

Given his penchant for transport, you have wonder how the artist will get around what is arguably the original modern metropolis. “Oh, I won’t go on the subway,” says Burden. “I’ll walk.”

his past December, just as retailers were making their holiday markdowns and non-profits issuing their year-end appeals, the Storefront for Art and Architecture was opening its last exhibition of 2011. Spurred by Occupy Wall Street, Strategies for Public Occupation featured “projects and strategies that offer a new, creative and productive way of spatial occupation for public demonstrations and actions in cities throughout the world.” In parallel Storefront hosted a week of workshops, performances and lectures in which artists and architects presented their own interpretations of the Occupy movement. Strategies for Public Occupation was, in short, intended to be a summation of interventionist practices and a wide-ranging discussion about the relationships among citizens, cultural producers and public space.

Unfortunately, Storefront got the title wrong.

Read More …

The city. The city is arguably the dominant subject of architectural discourse today. Its return came in topical waves over the last decade: landscape urbanism, infrastructural urbanism, networks, shrinking cities, and wholesale metropolises constructed in China and the Middle East. And the 2008 bust, with the almost overnight evaporation of building commissions, by default solidified the city as subject, as the singular project for investigation. New York City’s grid, Detroit’s ruin, and Los Angeles’ heterogeneous sprawl proved enticing topics of research and speculation. Read More …